The second form of evidence were the indentations on the horses’ teeth and damage to skeletal tissue in the mouths. Archaeologists said that this was caused by the wearing of bits, mouthpieces inserted for harnessing with a bridle or similar restraint to control working animals. Similar discoveries have been made at other sites but have been disputed as support for domestication.
The exact time and location of the beginning of the domestication of the horse has eluded archaeologists. In 2007, David W. Anthony, an archaeologist at Hartwick College in Oneonta, N.Y., said that some of the best evidence put the beginning of horse domestication in the region around 2500 B.C. The question of roughly when domestication began has been answered, but what about the reason why? Who was the first to attempt to do so?
Wilford, John, N. (2009, March 06). Earlier date suggested for horse domestication. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/06/science/06horses.html?ref=horses
It is extremely interesting to see such an early date for the domestication of this wild animal. How archaeologist discover this is even more astonishing. Perhaps it was used for labor or traveling? Who exactly decided to begin this however, is probably not the easiest question to answer.
ReplyDeleteIt is interesting to know that horses were domesticated very early in life. Horses have been domesticated as a use of transportation by chariot burials dated c. 2000 BCE. Although the date of the domestication of the horse depends to some degree upon the definition of "domestication." The question on "who was the first to to do" is still a mystery but the horses did appear in Paleolithic cave art.
ReplyDelete